i. Relative
Self-Sufficiency. In the past, a
traditional village was very much self-sufficient in several respects. The
village was a unit of production as well as consumption. Politically there was
less interference from outside world. Conflicts arising in the villages were
solved in the village panchayat itself. There were also caste panchayat to give
respective rights to each caste.
But gradually, the village community In India has been changed. It is no
more static; it has changed from time to time. According to modern
anthropological studies, the village community was not and is not
self-sufficient. The whole nature of the traditional society is militated
against the independent isolation of a village. In earlier days there was a
good deal of coming and going among villages.
ii. Microcosm
of Caste Society. The village is
usually multi-caste. The pattern of Interactions among the various caste groups
is governed by ritual hierarchy which in turn is manifested in rules governing,
commensality, pollution, occupation and marriage.
But the British rule in India gave a serious blow to the caste system in
the villages. Caste panchayats became extinct. The caste system lost its
traditional hold in the villages. But casteism is getting strengthened on
account of selfish political interests.
iii. Hierarchy
of Settlement Pattern. The
geography of a village follows a fixed pattern. Each caste usually has a
separate settlement ward. In Gujarat, such areas are called “Phaliya”, In
Karnataka it is “Keri”, in Maharashtra it is “Wada”. Everywhere we find the so
called untouchables and Dalits live separately from the caste Hindus. The
members of a ward show a strong sense of unity. Inter ward disputes occur
occasionally like inter-village disputes.
iv. Jajmani
as a system of exchange. It has
been the basis of economic, social and cultural solidarity in the villages. It
involved both the relationship of dominance and reciprocity. Under this system
some castes are patrons (Jajman) and other are service castes (Kameen).
These service castes generally under obligation to serve the patron
castes and their families. But now-a-days, this system has been weakened due to
the influence of market forces, migration, contacts with towns, impact of education
etc.
v. Village
Solidarity. People live in villages
with close proximity and close interaction among them. They share the same
familiar life-space, share the common experiences of natural forces/disasters/
calamities etc. A villager’s closest economic associates are within his
village.
Their very life experiences develop a sense of unity and identity. This
sense of solidarity is reflected in various contexts. Village solidarity is
commonly expressed in village ceremonies. Ritual occasions, for example the
life-cycle ceremonies require the co-operation of several castes. The
functioning of the village as a political and social entity brings together
members of all castes.
vi. Religion.
Religion provides the woof and worf
of the community life in a village. The Hinduism that they follow is neither of
the high spiritual order nor of the abstract intellectual type, nor even of the
popular puranic nature. They worship number of Gods and goddesses such as
Durga-Kali, Lakshmi, Saraswati etc.
People also worship the village deities. They also worship trees,
especially “Pipal” and the “Tulsi” Beliefs in ghosts and witches are also
prevalent.
Temple-the place of worship is also a place where the people from all
castes get together to celebrate religions and social occasions. It is a place
of congregation. Festivals are also celebrated in each and every village with
pump and ceremony. Festivals strengthen the association of castes in the
villages.
vii. Factionalism.
Every village witnesses elements of
factionalism in its daily round of activities. There are many basis of
factionalism such as economic, kinship ties, caste affiliation, new political
consciousness etc. With the breakdown of Jajmani relations, many kamin (castes)
have shifted their allegiance to new groups usually outside the village namely
urban businessmen.
Modern politics has led to the strengthening of what sociologists call
“horizontal solidarity” that is solidarity of caste. Now castes belonging to
different villages come together to act as “pressure group”. This has special
bearing on the traditional power structure. Improved means of transport and
communication system have further consolidated this trend towards factionalism.
Post a Comment