Sociology

Durkheim Types Of Suicide

Le Suicide, Durkheim’s third major work is of great importance, was published in 1897 because it is his first serious effort to establish empiricism in sociology. Empiricism would provide a sociological explanation for a phenomenon traditionally regarded as exclusively psychological and individualistic.

Durkheim sought to develop a sociological theory of suicide, which meant that suicide had to be explained in terms of social causes. Durkheim has made an extremely minute and detailed study of the phenomenon of suicide. His theory of suicide is related in various ways to his study of the Division of labour. It is also linked with his theory of “social constraint” theory and his views on “Collective conscience.” He used the method of statistical analysis to display sociological realism. This method serves two purposes:

1. To refute theories based on psychology, biology, genetics, climatic and geographical factors.

2. To support with empirical evidence, his own sociological explanation of suicide.

Thus, the phenomena of suicide demonstrate the function of sociological theory in empirical science.

Durkheim has established the view that there are no societies in which suicide does not occur. It means suicide may be considered a normal that is a regular occurrence. However, a sudden increase in suicide rates may be witnessed. This, he said, could be taken as “an index of disintegrating forces at work in a social structure.” He also concluded that different rates of suicide are the consequences of differences in degree and type of social solidarity. Suicide is a kind of index to decay in social solidarity.

According to Durkheim, suicide is “every case of death resulting directly or indirectly from a positive or negative death performed by the victim himself and which strives to produce this result.” Durkheim used this definition to separate actual suicide from accidental deaths. He then collected several European Nations' suicide rate statistics, which proved relatively constant among those nations and smaller demographics within those nations. Thus, a collective tendency towards suicide was discovered.

CAUSES OF SUICIDE

Durkheim drew his theoretical conclusions on the social causes of suicide. According to Durkheim, the causation of suicide should be referred to as social structure and its ramifying functions. These may perform three parts:

1. Inducement

2. Perpetuation

3. Aggravation of suicide potential

According to Durkheim, it is the social circumstances and the influence of the collective consciousness which are mainly responsible for the phenomenon of suicide. He says, “Suicide is an act which society disapproves of expiation.” Durkheim also showed that all other views regarding it are conditioned by the prevailing social conditioned and mirror the collective consciousness. According to Durkheim, a depressed man commits suicide not because of depression but due to heightened sensitivity to social conditions in a depressed man.

TYPES OF SUICIDES

Durkheim proposed four types of Suicide based on the degrees of imbalance of two social forces:

1. Social Integration

2. Moral regulation

1. Egoistic or Individualistic Suicide: According to Durkheim, when a man becomes socially isolated or feels that he has no place in society, he destroys himself. This is the suicide of a self-centered person who lacks altruistic feelings and is usually cut off from the mainstream of society.

For example, He found that among the Catholics, suicides were comparatively less than among the Protestants. He also found that Catholicism can integrate its members fully into its fold. On the other hand, Protestantism fosters a spirit of free inquiry, permits great individual freedom, lacks hierarchic organizations, and has fewer common beliefs and practices. It is known that the Catholic Church is more powerfully integrated than the Protestant church. In this way, the Protestants are more prone to commit suicide than the Catholics. Hence, Durkheim generalized that the lack of integration is the leading cause of egoistic suicide.

2. Altruistic Suicide: This type of suicide results from a high level of integration of the individual into his social group. Durkheim found another type of relationship of the individual with the moral order, i.e., excessive binding of the individual to society which often leads to suicide.

There are three different types of altruistic suicide.

1. Obligatory altruistic suicide: In obligatory altruistic suicide, individuals are so strongly governed by customs and traditions that there is a repeated tendency among individuals to subordinate personal interests and sacrifice one’s life to achieve social ends. This is seen among the societies which impose ancient forms of obedience. So it is common among primitive people. The practice of “sati,” which was once in practice in North India, is another example of this kind.

2. Optional altruistic suicide: This type of optional altruistic suicide is not so much so obligatory or imposed by society on the individuals. They are optional. Japanese sometimes illustrate this type of suicide. They call it “Harakiri.” In this practice of Harakiri, some Japanese take off their lives for the sake of the larger social unity. They consider that self-destruction would prevent the breakdown of social unity; self-immolation by Buddhist monks is an example.

3. Acute altruistic suicide: Here, an individual commits suicide purely for the joy of sacrifice and higher existence. Durkheim states that altruistic suicide is a characteristic of less advanced societies. However, Durkheim finds in modern society the example of the soldier in the army. Wherever altruistic suicide is prevalent, man is always ready to sacrifice his life for a great cause, principle, ideal, or value.

3. Anomic Suicide: This type of suicide concerns social disorganization and imbalance. Anomie means normlessness. Anomie describes the situation in which the normative framework breaks down goals again, outruns the means, and the suicide rate increases. Anomic suicide is more likely to occur when the regulative powers of society are disrupted. Such disruptions are likely to leave individuals dissatisfied because there is little control over their passions. Rates of anomic suicide are likely to rise whether the nature of disruption is positive or negative. This type of suicide occurs during industrial or financial crises. It is not because they cause poverty, since crises of prosperity have the same result, but because they are crises of the collective order.

Anomic suicide was of particular interest to Durkheim. So he divided it into four categories.

1. Acute economic anomie: The traditional institutions, such as religion, guilds, pre-industrial social structures, etc., are seeing a gradual decline in their capacity to control and satisfy the requirements of society as a whole.

2. Chronic economic anomie: This was a product of the long-term diminution of social regulation of the relation between means and ends. The erosion of the influence of agencies that had exercised moral restraint over economic relations, particularly religious and occupational groups, resulted in industry being regarded as an end. Thus, the suicide rates were higher in manufacturing and commercial occupations than in agriculture because the latter still had traditions and customs that exercised restraint. Constant economic strife for limitless goals could not bring happiness, as was shown by the fact that the higher socio-economic strata had higher rates of suicide than the poor.

3. Acute domestic anomie: Sudden changes on the micro-social level resulted in an inability to adapt and, therefore, higher suicide rates. Widowhood is a prime example of this type of anomie.

4. Chronic domestic anomie: It refers to how marriage as an institution regulates the sexual and behavioural means-needs balance among men and women. Marriage provided different regulations for each. However, bachelors tended to commit suicide at higher rates than married men because of a lack of regulation and established goals and expectations. On the other hand, traditionally, marriage has over-regulated women's lives by further restricting their already limited opportunities and plans. Unmarried women do not experience chronic domestic anomie nearly as often as unmarried men.

4. Fatalistic Suicide: Fatalistic suicide was at the high extreme of the regulation continuum. He described it as suicide of “persons with futures pitilessly blocked and passions violently choked by oppressive discipline.” Durkheim sees it as a rare phenomenon in the real world and found where there is an excessive norm and regulations prevail. For example, such as the situation of childless married women (presumably where the divorce was difficult), young husbands, and slaves.

Emile Durkheim’s most famous work, “Suicide: A Study in Sociology,” was prepared to flout common sense and excite people's imagination. It is widely regarded as sociology’s exemplary research because it skillfully interrelates theory and data, uses data to test and develop theory, and uses theory to explain data. It is an approach that allowed Durkheim to reject competing biological and psychological theories while validating his sociological theory of variation in suicide rates.